Law student Tessa Silverman, who attended the protest, told Reuters that Duncan himself appeared angry and called some students "idiots," something Duncan acknowledged and repeated during Reuters' interview. And when a Supreme Court vacancy opens under the Republican president, whether its Trump, Gov. It reinforces the notion that we should stay silent in spaces where our views might not be welcomed. . The judge, visibly flustered, decided to open the floor for questions., According to Lats post, after one students question about a decision denying a pro se motion to use the petitioners preferred pronouns, Duncan responded with, Read the opinion. Reluctantly, Duncan let Steinbach speak. In spaces where provocation is essential opinion columns, universities and law schools in particular it discourages the challenging of orthodoxy in favor of the comfortable cosseting of preexisting views. The ban does not include current students at the schools. News explained in charts, maps, photography and videos, Stanford students lost a chance to learn when they shouted down a judge, Fed-up teachers in Tennessee find a novel answer to anti-woke hysteria, Montgomery parents want an opt-out on sexuality, gender education restored, Georgia teacher did not give parents a choice, After Mississippi banned his hormone shots, an 8-hour journey, A Ukrainian villages final farewell to soldier highlights toll of war. On Thursday, March 16, a van sponsored by Accuracy in Media appeared on campus, driving around with the words, Tirien Steinbach uses fascist tactics to bully others. in Political Science from Northwestern University and earned her law degree from the University of Houston Law Center in 1993. It was in protest of his actions as an attorney and a judgeI think its a mistake to look at their protest as directed at merely unpopular ideas or opinions. These are law students. Our 2-Week Public Speaking + Introduction to Debate Experience is designed to be a student's first structured experience with public speaking, debate and formal argumentation - no prior experience is necessary. You are an appalling idiot, he told one student. Duncan called some of protesters appalling idiots and bullies, remarks he later defended. If they posted signs saying Fuck Judge Duncan in the halls tomorrow, would I defend the signs on free-speech grounds? Duncan was shouted down; as he entered the classroom to give his talk, he said, one protester yelled, We hope your daughters get raped. Duncans response can be safely described as injudicious. All contents The invitation sparked controversy and opposition by some students who put up flyers around the law school after learning of his arrival. The Daily regrets this error. We are all better off in a world where we dont have to second-guess ourselves before venturing an unpopular opinion. Portland State University professor Jennifer Ruth, a member of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Committee A for academic freedom, wrote a blog post on Monday in Academe Blog, a website published by the AAUP. His talk was on "Covid, Guns, and . More important, hearing the views of the other side can only aid in rebutting them. Last week, the federal judge Kyle Duncan traveled to the highly ranked law school at Stanford University. The most comprehensive solution to manage all your complex and ever-expanding tax and compliance needs. Thats why he walked into the school with his phone out, recording student protesters (and taking care to get close-up shots of their faces). Duncan himself called on Stanford to fire Steinbachsaying she had subjected him to a "bizarre therapy session from hell"and two circuit court judges, James Ho and Elizabeth Branch, announced . FedSoc also asked Steinbach to attend the event as an observer and de-escalator, if necessary, according to Steinbachs Wall Street Journal opinion piece published after the fact. 1. Build the strongest argument relying on authoritative content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology. Do you have something so incredibly important to say about Twitter and guns and COVID that that is worth this impact on the division of these people who have sat next to each other for years, who are going through what is the battle of law school together, so that they can go out into the world and be advocates? (Reuters) - Two conservative federal appeals court judges will not hire future students at Stanford Law School as law clerks after a speech by another conservative jurist at the school was disrupted by student protesters last month. The seeming failure of the Stanford protesters to think more than two steps ahead about the norms theyre embracing and the world those norms would create is striking. And I hope so, and Ill stay for your remarks to see, because I do want to know your perspective. His decision to insult law students like a shameless, juvenile partisan reads like a bid for praise from the Republican power brokers who control judicial appointments. Nobody should be surprised that he ran with it. Meanwhile, I welcome your correspondence if you have suggestions for future questions, thoughts on what is below, or anything on a subject youre confident Ill never ask about. Studies show strong family connections for prisoners can reduce the chance they will end up behind bars again, and even improve outcomes for kids with incarcerated parents. MATTHEW RICE Friday, March 10, 2023 13:49:27 pm. The whole thing was a staged public shaming, and after I realized that I refused to play along., The notion that Steinbach staged her speech is popular among Duncans defenders, including FedSoc president Rosenberger, who wrote, While perhaps well intentioned, delivering a pre-written speech haranguing the judged (sic) was inappropriate., Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne and SLS Dean Jenny Martinez issued a formal apology to Duncan in a letter on Saturday, March 11, stating that staff members who should have enforced university policies failed to do so, and instead intervened in inappropriate ways that are not aligned with the universitys commitment to free speech., Martinez stood by Tessier-Lavignes statement in her March 22 letter to the SLS community, citing the statement as reason for why administrators should not insert themselves into debate with their own criticism of the speakers views and the suggestion that the speaker reconsider whether what they plan to say is worth saying. Her letter went on to state, Steinbach is currently on leave. No. Policing the civility of the response to speech and not speech itself is incoherent nonsense. If their view is we cant respond to awful speech, we can only stop it from happening, then theyre going to be terrible lawyers. Duncan is the judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, covering Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana. He emerged as a folk hero on the right, the audacious judge who punched back at crybullies on the left who tried to silence his free speech. And as media scholar Joanna Zylinska has argued, water infrastructures are particularly potent means of thinking through politics. After an administrator and a student leader quieted the protesters, the judge skipped his speech and moved directly to Q&A. At home, around the dinner table? The Stanford Reviews opinion is shared by several conservative organizations, including Accuracy in Media, a non-profit conservative news media watchdog. But with this provocation, Duncan may have moved toward the front of the pack. He can be reached at nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com. "The way this event unfolded was not aligned with our institutional commitment to freedom of speech.". No a thousand times no not for his own good but for the very benefit of the students who are most offended by his position. The University did not respond to The Dailys request to comment on whether or not Steinbachs leave is voluntary. When I say Is the juice worth the squeeze? Thats what Im asking. Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, a Columbia Law School graduate who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, was invited by Stanford Law School's Federalist Society chapter to talk . As always, I welcome your thoughts, concerns, suggestions, and reflections.. A coalition of students spearheaded by OutLaw, a campus LGBTQ group, was upset that Duncan was invited to speak, saying he has taken positions that threatened the rights of LGBTQ people, immigrants, Black voters, women and others, according to a campus-wide email from a Stanford official that Reuters has reviewed. They engage in disruption, intimidation, and public shaming. Reuters provides business, financial, national and international news to professionals via desktop terminals, the world's media organizations, industry events and directly to consumers. That is all we need to know, protester Hayden Henderson JD 24 said. So, helicopter parents hover over their offspring to spare them abrasive encounters with the world. I pointed out that while free speech isnt easy or comfortable, its necessary for democracy, and I was glad it was happening at our law school, she wrote. Additional reporting by Jacqueline Thomsen, Law firm Clifford Chance posts increased revenue, stalled profits, Shearman real estate finance partner is latest exit as merger looms, Corporate attorneys dont want to pay law firms for ChatGPT whenthey could use it themselves, How litigation funding drives progress in the ESG agenda, Cold War-era atomic bomb site could host largest US solar development, McConnell lapse, Biden stumble highlight advanced age of US leaders, AstraZeneca Q2 results beat estimates; COVID vaccine sales dry up, Italy wins EU nod to clinch 18.5 billion euros in post-COVID funds. All quotes delayed a minimum of 15 minutes. On Thursday, he rebranded, premiering a far more combative persona whos hellbent on owning the libs. Because the alternative is pallid mush, short on honesty and condemned to vapidity. Hoover Tower at Stanford University in Stanford, Calif., Nov. 25, 2022. Share. Stand up, fight back!, As Duncans speech commenced at its planned 12:45 p.m. start-time, the classroom filled with significantly more protesters than FedSoc members. 1972 (age 50-51) Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S. Education. Louisiana State University ( BA, JD) Columbia University ( LLM) Stuart Kyle Duncan (born 1972) is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Civility is important and too often lacking, as the Stanford incident itself demonstrated both the students and the judge apparently missed some important childhood lessons on that score. The student protesters, who formed a human corridor from Martinezs classroom to the buildings exit, comprised nearly a third of the law school, the students told the Washington Free Beacon. They did. Ruth also praised Steinbachs speech, specifically referencing how Steinbach reminded the students that they did not need to be there and were free to leave. But should Duncan, as Steinbach suggested, have chosen to turn down the Federalist Societys invitation and voluntarily absented himself from Stanfords campus? Students began shouting to explain to the judge that Steinbach was an administrator (and that is when Whelans video begins). In a post at The Popehat Report, the attorney and First Amendment expert Ken White offers scathing critiques of the Federalist Society, Judge Duncan, and the students who stopped the event: Students think that they should be able to dictate which speakers their peers invite, who can speak, what they can say, and who can listen. Judge Kyle Duncan, who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, was invited to speak at Stanford March 9 by the Federalist Society but was met with demonstrators holding. FedSoc declined their request the next day, thanking the students for taking the time to write and make [their] views known. Rosenberger added in the email, I gather from your note that you and others may find it more congenial not to engage with the Judge, but you are of course welcome to attend. Steinbach herself published an opinion piece, entitled Diversity and Free Speech Can Coexist at Stanford, in the Wall Street Journal on March 23. Duncan himself offers a useful encapsulation of the distinction. All rights reserved. Trump-appointed judges behind Yale clerk boycott to speak on campus. And luckily theyre in a school where they can learn the advocacy skills to advocate for those changes. Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan went to Stanford Law School looking for a fight, and he got one. A DEI dean at Stanford Law School, who went viral for her speech reprimanding a federal judge appointed by President Donald Trump while a mob of law students shouted him down, will resign from her . But she also expressed doubt that holding the event was worth the pain and the division that this causes and mused that maybe free-speech values should be reconsidered. So for now, Im going to hold off on a new question and promise to send out your excellent thoughts in the next newsletter. "However well-intentioned, attempts at . "For many people at the law school who work here, who study here, and who live here, your advocacyyour opinions from the benchland as absolute disenfranchisement of their rights, she told Duncan in the video clip. Exclusive news, data and analytics for financial market professionals, Reporting by Andrew Goudsward. But that is no longer enough. After about 10 minutes, Duncan responded angrily to the hecklers and asked for help from the Stanford administrators present, sitting like potted plants amid the chaos. Reach her at karen.sloan@thomsonreuters.com. John Roberts style of polite, restrained conservatism is out, jettisoned in favor of brawling, fiery radicalism. She told the students that she agreed with their criticisms of Duncan, but that they had to let him express his views. Tirien Steinbach, Stanford Law School's associate dean for diversity, equity and inclusion, resigned Thursday, months after her confrontation with Trump-appointed Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan went . The initial narrative was heavily shaped by a video and accompanying Twitter thread posted by Ed Whelan, a conservative commentator best known for falsely accusing one of Brett Kavanaughs classmates of sexually assaulting Christine Blasey Ford on the basis of Zillow floor plans. Access unmatched financial data, news and content in a highly-customised workflow experience on desktop, web and mobile. They reached out to FedSoc that night to ask that FedSoc either cancel his event or move it to Zoom. FedSoc hoped to learn about important areas of law that have particular connection to the 5th Circuit, Rosenberger wrote in an email to The Daily. The most comprehensive solution to manage all your complex and ever-expanding tax and compliance needs. The juice is always worth the squeeze. Stanford Law School (SLS) became the target of public scrutiny after Judge Kyle Duncans visit to SLS on Thursday, March 9 was continuously interrupted and cut short due to the heated interactions between Duncan, the student protesters and the SLS Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Tirien Steinbach. "It would be nice if they reached out to me and said, 'Gee, we're sorry," he said of Stanford. But we are still learning exactly how much of this industrys genius was a mere LIRP, or low-interest-rate phenomenon. A federal appeals court judge, Kyle Duncan, at Stanford Law School on March 10, 2023. The conservative legal movement is increasingly looking for judges who approach the job with a politicians instinct for ruthless demolition of the opponent. Student activists could have responded to the apology that Martinez sent with an incisive brief that went point by point through her assertions, bringing to bear the strongest possible counterarguments, whatever those are. He must also yearn for a street fight with his ideological foes. At that point, Tirien Steinbach, the associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion (and a Black woman), approached the judge. Instead of validating a faulty premise that all but guarantees some students will continue to feel a sense that they dont belongeven though they do in fact belongthe DEI dean ought to have reminded students that they were officially admitted by Stanford Law as many others were rejected, and that so long as they are enrolled, no outside speaker has any power to change that they belong. Before his elevation to the 5th U.S. She was deeply, deeply uncomfortable because the Federalist Societys event was tearing at the fabric of this community. Continuing with her self-absorbed inventory of her feelings, and fluent in DEI-speak, she told of her labors creating a space of belonging and places of safety. She said, with Duncan standing nearby, that even abhorrent speech that literally denies the humanity of people should not be censored because me and many people in this administration do absolutely believe in free speech.. (The Supreme Court soon overruled him. Readers can find in the Washington Free Beacon the insulters unintended proof that there is indecent exposure of the mind as well as the body. Some argued that Steinbach should be fired, others condemned the protesters actions and still others called Duncans reaction to the protesters a tantrum.. The protesting students rights and interests are neither inferior to nor superior to the interests of the FedSoc and Judge Duncan. Screen for heightened risk individual and entities globally to help uncover hidden risks in business relationships and human networks. Slate is published by The Slate My recent work is on moonshine, and involves aspects of number theory, algebra, geometry and mathematical physics. 2023 The administrations statement frames Judge Duncan as a victim, when in fact he himself made civil dialogue impossible.. UPDATE: Judge Duncan has published an op-ed about in the Wall Street Journal, "My Struggle Session at Stanford Law School." The article provides his perspective on what happened before, during . U.S. The University did not respond to The Dailys request to comment on this protest or on the ACS letter. Martinezs letter comes after commentators from various American media outlets have expressed their own views of the event and protest. Duncan got the attention he so obviously wanted, drawing instant support from GOP senators and Fox News. How much better off would they have been to allow him to speak, and to respectfully challenge his reasoning in the pronoun case? 01:29 Hundreds of black-clad, masked students hijacked a class by the head of Stanford Law School in protest at her apologizing to the Trump-appointed federal judge who copped abuse from the. In a speech that has now amassed millions of views on social media, Steinbach stepped in to speak to both Duncan and the crowd. This week, Colorado lawmakers advanced a bill that would make all state prison calls free. In the post, Ruth argued that by seizing on and amplifying any story featuring left students protesting, libertarian-funded media outlets handed social conservatives the vehicle they intend to ride to the White House in 2024. These events have captured the attention of professors and higher educators around the country. The Stanford Law School diversity dean will step down after her much-criticized scolding of a conservative federal judge who was shouted down by student protesters at a campus appearance. Duncan served as lead trial and appellate counsel in a case that stopped transgender people from using the bathroom of their choice at state institutions. Whether made from Aberdeen granite or stainless steel, whether ensconced in a leafy urban park or tucked into a nook in the local library, the drinking fountain constitutes a nexus of civic infrastructures and economies and ecosystems. He was appointed to the court by President Donald Trump in 2017 and confirmed . Even this appearance of bias, whether real or not, should be avoided., George F. Will: Expensively credentialed, negligibly educated Stanford brats threw a tantrum. He eventually ceded the floor to Steinbach after she repeatedly told Duncan that she was the administrator present. About 30 minutes into his speech, Duncan stopped his remarks to ask for an administrator to help handle the commentary and heckling from the protesters. After departing, the judge embarked upon a conservative media tour, declaring that the coddled law students behaved like dogshit and urging Stanford to discipline them. In an interview with Rod Dreher on March 12, a conservative writer and editor who used to write for The American Conservative, Duncan told Dreher, Try delivering a lecture under those circumstances. Ho said he was suspicious of the letter because it imposes no consequences on anyone. He accused elite law schools like Stanford of discriminating against religious conservatives and suggested faculty and administrators were afraid to take action to stop it. By this, Steinbach meant that Duncan should consider whether his appearance at Stanford was worth the obvious rancor and ferment it had created. This is the wrong question, and while theres been enough appropriately horrified commentary about the unacceptable behavior of the Stanford students who heckled Duncan, its important to explain why. Something Ive always liked about the founders, venture capitalists, and tech evangelists that Ive met over the years is their disposition toward technology as a lever for progress. This is a flimsy excuse for intolerance and a lack of simple decency toward a fellow human being. Pseudo-intellectual smugness and moral cowardice apparently are necessary and sufficient prerequisites for DEI careers there are many thousands of them enforcing campus orthodoxies. Ethics Observations On The Stanford Students' Abuse Of Judge Duncan [Updated!] U.S. No thanks. (Reuters) - Stanford Law School will not discipline students who disrupted a campus speech by a conservative federal judge earlier this month, but an official who appeared to intervene on the. In reality, Stanford hosts many such events due to their obvious educational value: It is vital for lawyers to understand how judges think, perhaps wrongheaded judges most of all! Duncan not only rejected the inmates petition he disregarded her request that she be referred to by the female pronouns. Screen for heightened risk individual and entities globally to help uncover hidden risks in business relationships and human networks. But Duncan said he did not get far into his planned remarks, saying he was heckled by some of the estimated 100 protesters who he said shouted at him and were carrying "vulgar" signs in some cases critical of him. Duncan said he felt attacked by Steinbach's comments. Some sat in chairs with others lining the back and side walls of the room. March 10 - A federal appeals court judge appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump on Friday said Stanford Law School in California owed him an apology after dozens of student. At a time when lofty yet disembodied notions of democracy and freedom are running thin, she writes, we need to work on developing more grounded and more fluid modes of political thinking and action, modes that take our relations with the environment seriously Perceiving water as the elemental medium, before it is turned into a resource, an industrial product, or a background to modern economies, needs to be the first step on this journey. Grounded, embodied, and anything but lofty, the drinking fountain reveals much about the charged politics of public spaces, and about the public things that, again to quote Bonnie Honig, furnish the world of democratic life., reduce the chance they will end up behind bars again, free prison phone calls across the country. When Federalist Society members in law school pull a stunt like blocking a progressive students graduation or flashing a gun in Zoom class, they are merely emulating their future bosses. After being introduced by the Federalist Societys president, a gay man, Duncan tried to speak into a din of shouting: Youre not welcome here, we hate you, You have no right to speak here, etc. Steinbach validates the falsehood that the mere presence of a federal judge at a law school bears on whether any student belongs there as if his physical proximity to the campus pollutes its purity, or as if his speaking there, at the invitation of a group that represents a small minority of students, somehow signifies Stanford Law Schools endorsement of the jurists moral character, political values, or jurisprudence, Freidersdorf wrote. Stanford Law Dean Jenny Martinez published a letter last month in which she said administrators did not enforce the schools free speech policy during the event and said one school official who addressed Duncan and described his appearance as painful for some students was on leave. Civility is as civility does. I am a research fellow in the Institute of Mathematics at Academia Sinica. In the video, it appears he did not recognize that she was the administrator he had requested; Youre an administrator? he asked. Videos of the event posted online show Duncan, a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, facing off with . The judge has likely concluded that conducting himself like a truculent provocateur will increase his odds of advancing to the Supreme Court under a future Republican president. All quotes delayed a minimum of 15 minutes. The ultraconservative judge, a Donald Trump nominee, ostensibly visited the campus on Thursday to talk about COVID, guns, and Twitter at an event sponsored by the Stanford Federalist Society. Photo: Image Of Sport/Zuma Press. I am still long on American invention and innovation, which is a way of saying that Im long on Silicon Valley as a place and as an idea. March 11, 2023 / Jack Marshall. "However well-intentioned, attempts at managing the room in this instance went awry," she wrote. Duncan visited Stanford to deliver remarks to the campus chapter of the conservative Federalist Society. In most deplatforming debates, the illiberal side argues that giving a speaker a platform gives them more power to do harm. Yes. On Wednesdays, he rounds up timely conversations and solicits reader responses to one thought-provoking question. It is a violation of the disruption policy to prevent the effective carrying out of a public event. Heckling and other forms of interruption that prevent a speaker from making or completing a presentation are inconsistent with the policy While students in the room may do things such as quietly hold signs or ask pointed questions during question and answer periods, they may not do so in a way that disrupts the event or prevents the speaker from delivering their remarks The school is reviewing what transpired and will work to ensure protocols are in place so that disruptions of this nature do not occur again. Later, he publishes some thoughtful replies. Upon graduation from the Law Center, she clerked for the Honorable Edith H. Jones, Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and was an associate at Vinson & Elkins . I first encountered him in 2020, when he went out of his way to be disrespectful to a transgender prisoner who asked that her name be changed in the prison system. Browse an unrivalled portfolio of real-time and historical market data and insights from worldwide sources and experts. She said that she wholeheartedly welcomed Duncan to campus, but told him, For many people here, your work has caused harm. Twice Steinbach asked, Is the juice worth the squeeze? seeming to question if he believed his speech was worth the reaction. He wrote, The protesters showed not the foggiest grasp of the basic concepts of legal discourse: That one must meet reason with reason, not power. Members of this new guard know what they were put on the bench to do. And they are too hubris-swollen not too stupid, but too drunk with self-righteousness to see that exceptions to free speech have always been used most harmfully against the powerless Theyre too full of themselves to see that let a crowd decide who is allowed to speak is a horrific norm to promote with grotesque historic resonance. Is the juice worth the squeeze? Thats the question that Tirien Steinbach, Stanford Law Schools associate dean for diversity, equity and inclusion, posed to Stuart Kyle Duncan regarding the federal appeals court judges now-notorious visit to campus earlier this month. At the event, when ostensibly urging student protesters to quiet down, the DEI dean said this to the judge: I have to ask myself and Im not a cynic to ask this: Is the juice worth the squeeze? School later apologized to 5th U.S. This calculation is perfectly rational. "In my view, this was a setup, she was working with students on this," he said.
Deaconess Hospital Address,
Spirit Mountain Tickets,
Archies Thongs Sale Ladies,
Articles S
